🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Significant Amount in Compensation from Clearing House over Frozen Assets The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking damages amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian state funds to aid Ukraine. The Legal Claim Based on accounts in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim. EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days on a plan to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic stability. The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main keeper for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth. Dispute on Ownership EU authorities have argued that their plan is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that title of the state assets remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine. Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of retaliatory actions, such as confiscating European corporate holdings within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal. Wider Implications With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States." The clearing house declined to comment on the new legal action. It has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts. Legal Hurdles Ahead Although courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that such holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm. EU Countermeasures European authorities said they are working on measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation." How the Funding Would Work Under the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay unaffected. Kyiv would only be required to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense damage caused during the nearly four-year conflict. Other Funding Ideas The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget. Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition. Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that if you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."